Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susan Hushin's avatar

Well…I need to think about this. Numinous is a word I too have been searching for. I have had this feeling many times in my life and could never explain it clearly, whether out loud or in my head. My daughters always teased me when we traveled together to a beautiful place, the desert, beach or a historical city. I would stand there staring, absorbing the experience and say something silly like “look at the awesome power or nature” or “engineering” or “ art”. It’s become a family thing to say “the awesome power of” whatever. But I know they feel it too. And didn’t have words.

I love your phrase “a visceral experience of the spirit or soul. …experience of transcendence.” That’s it! It’s not religion, it is part of our essence, that 90% of our brain we don’t use. There’s something in all of us to have a numinous experience. Maybe some have lost the ability, never learned to tap into it, or rejected it.

Having such a beautiful word for this is …awesome!!! This was a wonderful read. I love listening to your words too. 😍😍💕

Expand full comment
Lisa Fortini-Campbell's avatar

I was so happy to read your reflection on the “numinous.” I first heard the word some years ago when my friend, Fr. Joe, was studying once again the works of the German theologian Rudolf Otto. Apparently, it was Otto who brought the word into common usage in his 1917 book, “The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and its Relation to the Rational.” Fr. Joe was ordained in 1956 and explained that Otto’s work and ideas were hugely influential during his seminary years, and not just on Roman Catholics, but on students of theology in many different religious traditions up to the late 1960s. There was a time, he said, “When Rudolf Otto was a name on everyone’s lips.” Imagine!

When Fr. Joe (who was a seminary professor himself) tried to explain the concept to me, it seemed at once totally obvious and completely obscure. But, I think that’s a function of the way academics think and write! The descriptions are always so abstract. You have to know what they’re talking about to know what they’re talking about. Your explanation is far better and immediately accessible.

In case you’re interested, here is what Otto wrote in trying to explain the idea (from Wikipedia): “The feeling of it may at times come sweeping like a gentle tide pervading the mind with a tranquil mood of deepest worship. It may pass over into a more set and lasting attitude of the soul, continuing, as it were, thrillingly vibrant and resonant, until at last it dies away and the soul resumes its “profane,” non-religious mood of everyday experience. [...] It has its crude, barbaric antecedents and early manifestations, and again it may be developed into something beautiful and pure and glorious. It may become the hushed, trembling, and speechless humility of the creature in the presence of—whom or what? In the presence of that which is a Mystery inexpressible and above all creatures.”

You and he are describing the same thing, but your musings are so much clearer. With your description, I think all of us can say, “Ah, yes! I know exactly what that is!” Thank you for bringing this lovely word and memories of my old friend back into my life today!

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts